Skip to main content
Articles from NCLC

Image

articles banner

Each Debt Collector Must Notify Consumer of Debt Verification Rights

July 27, 2016
Ninth Circuit’s July 20 Decision Important Step in Resolving Split Among the Courts In a comprehensive opinion in Hernandez v. Williams, Zinman & Parham PC, 2016 WL 3913445 (9th Cir. July 20, 2016), the Ninth Circuit held that “…the FDCPA unambiguously requires any debt collector—first or subsequent—to send a § 1692g(a) validation notice within five days of its first communication with a consumer...

Six Ways to Avoid the “One-Bite” Rule for RESPA Loss Mitigation Applications

July 26, 2016
In evaluating whether to file a court action for violations of the RESPA Reg. X loss mitigation rule, determine if the servicer evaluated any of the client’s earlier loss mitigation applications. Reg. X, 12 C.F.R. § 1024.41(i) provides that a servicer is "only required to comply with the requirements of this section for a single complete loss mitigation application for a borrower’s mortgage loan...

Exciting New Features Added to NCLC’s Digital Library

June 8, 2016
New features have just been added to our online treatises—the option to view search results ordered by section number (instead of by relevance) and flags to help you pinpoint just updated sections and significant law changes. This article contains tips on using these new features.

Spokeo Resources (for subscribers AND for non-subscribers)

May 27, 2016
Analyses and briefs to facilitate individual rights representation, addressing standing challenges based on the Supreme Court’s May 16, 2016, decision in Spokeo v. Robins: Statute-Specific Spokeo Analyses Telephone Consumer Protection Act Spokeo analysis: For subscribers to Federal Deception Law For non-subscribers Truth in Lending Act Spokeo analysis: For subscribers to Truth in Lending General...

Third Circuit: Collector Has Burden to Prove Exemption from FDCPA Liability

May 2, 2016
In Evankavitch v. Green Tree Servicing, L.L.C., 793 F.3d 355 (3d Cir. 2015), the Third Circuit holds that the mortgage servicer had the burden of persuasion with the jury that the servicer’s call to a third party was permitted by the § 1692b(3) exception. That exception allows follow-up calls to a third party for location information if “...the debt collector reasonably believes that the earlier...