Advanced Pleadings Search

This is a March 2025 amended complaint filed in the New Jersey federal court against a home equity “investment” lender bringing counts under the Truth in Lending Act, the New Jersey Home Ownership Security Act, the New Jersey UDAP statute, the New Jersey Truth in Consumer Contract Warranty and Notice Act, and a related party for aiding and abetting, seeking equitable relief, damages, punitive damages, and attorney fees.

This is a December 2024 opposition to the home equity investment lender’s motion to dismiss the debtor in bankruptcy’s adversary proceeding complaint and objection to a proof of claim filed in the bankruptcy court for the District of Colorado.

This is an August 2024 adversary proceeding complaint and objection to a proof of claim brought by the debtor in bankruptcy against a home equity “investment” lender, filed in the bankruptcy court for the District of Colorado.

In its March 2022 updates to a staff manual for its examiners, the CFPB noted that discrimination can satisfy the statutory requirements for unfairness under the Consumer Financial Protection Act. The Bureau did not determine that any particular discriminatory practice was unfair. 

DentalPlans made many thousands of telemarketing robocalls to the cell phones of Plaintiff and tens of thousands of other similarly situated Americans. On June 6, 2024, this Court denied defendant DentalPlans’ summary judgment motion on the issue of whether it had consent to make the calls, and granted Plaintiff’s motion for class certification.

The summary judgment ruling was based upon the Court’s finding that DentalPlans was required to have obtained “prior express written consent” for its robocalls, because that is the standard the FCC set for telemarketing robocalls.