RESPA

Complaint filed Dec. 3, 2021 N.D. Ga. by Rachel Scott Atlanta Legal Aid.   

Jury instructions, UDAP and RESPA claims. MD trial court undated  Shankle v Ocwen Servicing

Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Complaint: RESPA loss mitigation, RFI, and NOE rules, negligence, UDAP Tanasi v Citimortgage D. Conn.   Oct. 2016 TANASI and Tanasi, Plaintiffs, v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC. and M&T Bank, as Successor by Merger to Hudson City Savings Bank, N.A., Defendant., 2016 WL 11048311 (D.Conn.)

RESPA, UDAP, negligence (RESPA servicing dismissed) Jeff Gentes

Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Complaint: RESPA loss mitigation, RFI, and NOE rules, negligence, UDAP 

Tanasi v Citimortgage D. Conn.   Oct. 2016 TANASI and Tanasi, Plaintiffs, v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC. and M&T Bank, as Successor by Merger to Hudson City Savings Bank, N.A., Defendant., 2016 WL 11048311 (D.Conn.)

RESPA, UDAP, negligence (RESPA servicing dismissed) 

Jeff Gentes

Complaint RESPA loss mitigation, inadequate response to RFI and NOE, negligence, UDAP. TANASI and Tanasi, Plaintiffs, v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC. and M&T Bank, as Successor by Merger to Hudson City Savings Bank, N.A., Defendant., 2016 WL 11048311 (D.Conn.) RESPA, UDAP, negligence (RESPA servicing dismissed) Case brought by Connecticut Fair Housing Center, attorney Jeff Gentes.

This is a jury instruction in a federal case in the Northern District of California concerning a homeowner's challenge to foreclosure practices, including violations of TILA, RESPA, FDCPA, the California debt collection statute, and breach of fiduciary duty.  The instructions include a number of general items of relevance to most consumer litigation and then instructions related to the homeowner's specific legal claims.  These instructions are mentioned in a decision favoring the homeowner in Drakeford v. Cap. Benefit, Inc., 2022 WL 2643984 (N.D. Cal.

This is the first amended complaint in a federal action in Michigan alleging misrepresentation of the terms of residential home sales and financing agreements, failure to disclose hidden credit charges, and conducting business in an unfair and deceptive manner. The complaint alleges deceptive promises of homeownership that lured unsuspecting home buyers into predatory and abusive loans that were designed to fail.