Filter Results CategoriesCart
Highlight Updates History of Regulation Z and the FRB Interpretations

As Congress has recognized since the inception of TILA, the oversight of consumer credit is a full time job, beyond the capacity of a legislature. As a result, Congress delegated broad authority for the implementation of TILA to the Federal Reserve Board.187 The FRB responded by promulgating a comprehensive set of Truth in Lending rules known as Regulation Z, which has been in effect, in various forms, since July 1, 1969. The current version, now under the authority of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, is reprinted at Appendix B, infra. The original version and subsequent amendments are available online as companion material to this treatise.

The FRB’s version of Regulation Z is found at 12 C.F.R. part 226. When it took over rulemaking authority under TILA, the CFPB republished Regulation Z as 12 C.F.R. part 1026, without making substantive changes. In renumbering the sections of Regulation Z, the CFPB simply replaced the first “2” in “226” with “10,” so that, for example, the FRB’s Regulation Z § 226.35 became the CFPB’s § 1026.35. However, the CFPB changed some subsection numbers, mostly in the course of deleting footnotes that were part of the FRB’s version of the rule. The FRB’s version of Regulation Z has not been repealed, and continues to apply to the vehicle dealers that are excluded from the CFPB’s authority under TILA.

Regulation Z restates many sections of TILA verbatim but is generally a more thorough statement of Truth in Lending law than the statute. Reference to it is inescapable in almost any TILA case. Nevertheless, it became apparent almost as soon as Regulation Z was released that it left many questions unanswered, and the FRB immediately began to issue a stream of amendments to and interpretations of Regulation Z. The interpretations, in particular, deserve some description because they came from different sources within the FRB and carried different degrees of authority.

Pre-Simplification, the FRB issued several different kinds of interpretations of Regulation Z. The most authoritative were the Official Board Interpretations, published in the Code of Federal Regulations.188 Only sixty were issued prior to Simplification. Because these interpretations were approved by the FRB itself, they carried the same weight as did Regulation Z. FRB staff also issued informal interpretations of Regulation Z.189 These were typically written in response to individual inquiries from creditors. Between 1969 and 1976, all of these staff interpretations were “unofficial,” meaning that they were binding on neither the FRB nor the courts and thus could be relied upon by creditors only at their own risk. In 1976, however, an amendment to TILA190 authorized the issuance of “official staff interpretations,” which, while still nonbinding, provided protection from civil TILA actions to those creditors who followed them. As a result of this amendment, after 1976 there were “official” staff interpretations that gave legal protection to creditors following them and “unofficial” FRB staff interpretations (also known as Public Information Letters), which carried no creditor protection.

Truth in Lending Simplification did simplify this regulatory morass. Regulation Z was rewritten to accommodate the changes made in the Simplification Act. In the process, many previously disputed provisions were eliminated or clarified.191 The FRB added an appendix of model forms to Regulation Z, the proper use of which automatically places a creditor in compliance with the Act. Creditors were not required, however, to use the model forms. All of the existing interpretations of Regulation Z were replaced with the Official Staff Interpretations on Regulation Z.192

The official interpretations are to Regulation Z what Regulation Z is to TILA. They track Regulation Z clause by clause, clarifying the intent, giving examples of proper application, and, at times, inventing rules where none otherwise exist. When assessing any transaction for compliance with any Regulation Z provision, the corollary official interpretations provision should also be reviewed. As of July 21, 2011, authority over the official interpretations was transferred from the FRB to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).

In addition, the CFPB generally publishes supplementary information in the Federal Register to explain any revisions to Regulation Z or the official interpretations that it proposes or adopts, as did the FRB. These explanations are often useful in construing Regulation Z and its official interpretations. The supplemental information for amendments to Regulation Z and the commentary from February 11, 1969 to the present are available online as companion material to this treatise.


  • 187 {185} 15 U.S.C. § 1604.

  • 188 {186} See 12 C.F.R. §§ 226.101 et seq. (1981).

  • 189 {187} Summaries of these interpretations can be found in National Consumer Law Center, Truth in Lending in Transition § 2 (1982). The interpretations were also found in Consumer Credit Guide, a loose-leaf service published by Commerce Clearing House, but CCH has withdrawn them due to their replacement by the Official Staff Interpretations.

  • 190 {188} Pub. L. No. 94-222, 90 Stat. 197 (1976), amending TILA § 130(f), 15 U.S.C. § 1640(f).

  • 191 {189} For example, the definition of a security interest was clarified.

  • 192 {190} See comments of the FRB on the issue of replacing prior interpretations with a published commentary in 46 Fed. Reg. 50,288 (Oct. 9, 1981), available online as companion material to this treatise.