Home Foreclosures: Texas
Tex. Tax Code Ann. §§ 34.01 to 34.23 (West)
Method of Tax Sale: Tax Deed—sold at auction to highest bidder. § 34.01(m).
Pre-Sale Notice:
Number of Notices: One.
Tex. Tax Code Ann. §§ 34.01 to 34.23 (West)
Method of Tax Sale: Tax Deed—sold at auction to highest bidder. § 34.01(m).
Pre-Sale Notice:
Number of Notices: One.
Utah Code Ann. §§ 59-2-1301 to 59-2-1372 (West)
Method of Tax Sale: Tax Deed—sold at auction to highest bidder. § 59-2-1351.1.
Pre-Sale Notice:
Number of Notices: One.
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, §§ 5251 to 5263
Method of Tax Sale: Tax Deed—sold at auction to highest bidder. §§ 5252, 5261.
Pre-Sale Notice:
Number of Notices: One.
Va. Code Ann. §§ 58.1-3965 to 58.1-3975
Method of Tax Sale: Tax Deed—sold at auction to highest bidder. §§ 58.1-3965, 58.1-3967, 58.1-3969.
Pre-Sale Notice:
Number of Notices: One.
Wash. Rev. Code §§ 36.35.010 to 36.35.290 (county disposition of tax title property); §§ 84.64.005 to 84.64.225 (lien foreclosure)
Method of Tax Sale: Tax Deed—sold at auction to highest bidder. § 84.64.080. Public auction may be conducted by electronic media in accordance with § 36.16.145. § 84.64.225.
Pre-Sale Notice:
Number of Notices: Two.
W. Va. Code §§ 11A-1-1 to 11A-4-7
Method of Tax Sale: Tax Lien Certificate—sold at auction to highest bidder who pays at least amount of taxes, interest and charges. § 11A-3-14.
Pre-Sale Notice:
Number of Notices: One.
Wis. Stat. §§ 74.01 to 74.87, §§ 75.001 to 75.69
Method of Tax Sale: Tax Deed—property conveyed to county through foreclosure proceeding. §§ 75.35, 75.69.
Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 39-13-101 to 39-13-112
Method of Tax Sale: Tax Lien Certificate. § 39-13-108.
Pre-Sale Notice:
Number of Notices: One.
1. Use of appendix J. Appendix J sets forth the actuarial equations and instructions for calculating the annual percentage rate in closed-end credit transactions. While the formulas contained in this appendix may be directly applied to calculate the annual percentage rate for an individual transaction, they may also be utilized to program calculators and computers to perform the calculations.
The reasons for taking care to preserve documents are straightforward. A class member’s claim frequently depends upon the existence of records in the defendant’s possession. Missing records can extinguish a class member’s rights or at least make a proof of claim much more difficult, if not impossible. Destruction of records also may prove damaging to the class as a whole. For example, missing records may make it impossible for the plaintiff to prove numerosity or the extent and illegal nature of the defendant’s conduct.
The following are suggestions for advice to give to the named plaintiff regarding what to do when the plaintiff’s counsel objects to a question in the deposition:
Other objections that may be appropriate in a client’s deposition are objections to the form of the question—for example, if it is vague or compound. These objections are appropriate if the questions are confusing or call for varying responses. Questions that assume the answer may be objectionable because they lack foundation or presume facts not in evidence. When the plaintiff is being asked the same question multiple times, objecting that the question has been asked and answered is appropriate.
Effective July 21, 2011,1 the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act)2 Title X created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), with authority—among other powers—to issue regulations and bring enforcement actions against financial service providers that engage in unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices (UDAAP).
This section focuses on the standards used by the circuits in deciding whether to grant appellate review under Rule 23(f), but also provides numerous examples of decisions upholding or reversing class certification rulings.
Section 1681g(c) of the FCRA requires the CFPB to issue a general summary of consumer rights. The Summary of Consumer Rights is perhaps the single most common explanation of the FCRA most consumers will ever receive. Consumer reporting agencies must provide a copy of the Summary of Consumer Rights whenever a consumer requests disclosure of their file.5
The FCRA requires that a Summary of Consumer Rights be included with the disclosures.552 This summary describes the consumer’s rights to receive reports and credit scores, and to dispute information.553 Consumer reporting agencies need not provide the exact Summary as published, as they are permitted to provide a substantially similar document.554
Has state opted out of federal bankruptcy exemptions? No. See In re Tinkess, 459 B.R. 76 (Bankr. D. Alaska 2008) (finding that Alaska Stat. § 09.38.055 lacks sufficient specificity to operate as an opt-out statute).
Is opt out limited to residents or domiciliaries of the state? Not applicable.
Do state’s exemptions have extraterritorial application?
Homestead: No. Alaska Stat. § 09.38.010 limited to “property in this state.”
Has state opted out of federal bankruptcy exemptions? Yes. Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 33-1133.
Is opt out limited to residents or domiciliaries of the state? Yes. Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 33-1133: “Residents of this state are not entitled to the Federal exemptions provided in 11 U.S.C. § 522(d).” See In re Rody, 468 B.R. 384 (Bankr. D. Ariz. 2012) (Arizona opt-out applicable only to Arizona residents).
Do state’s exemptions have extraterritorial application?
Has state opted out of federal bankruptcy exemptions? Yes. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 703.130 (West).
Is opt out limited to residents or domiciliaries of the state? Not specified. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 703.130 (West): “[T]he exemptions set forth in [§ 522(d)] . . . are not authorized in this state.”
Do state’s exemptions have extraterritorial application?
Has state opted out of federal bankruptcy exemptions? Yes. Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-54-107.
Is opt out limited to residents or domiciliaries of the state? Yes. Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-54-107: “[T]he exemptions in [§ 522(d)] are denied to residents of this state. Exemptions authorized to be claimed by residents of this state shall be limited to those exemptions expressly provided by the statutes of this state.”
Do state’s exemptions have extraterritorial application?
Has state opted out of federal bankruptcy exemptions? No.
Is opt out limited to residents or domiciliaries of the state? Not applicable.
Do state’s exemptions have extraterritorial application?
Homestead: Uncertain.
Personal property: Uncertain.
Wages: Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 52-352b(4), 52-361a, 52-367b.
Has state opted out of federal bankruptcy exemptions? Yes. Del. Code Ann. tit. 10, § 4914.
Is opt out limited to residents or domiciliaries of the state? Yes. Del. Code Ann. tit. 10, § 4914: “[A]n individual debtor domiciled in Delaware is not authorized or entitled to elect the Federal exemptions . . . [in § 522(d)] and may exempt only that property from the estate as set forth is subsection (b) of this section.”
Do state’s exemptions have extraterritorial application?
Has state opted out of federal bankruptcy exemptions? No.
Is opt out limited to residents or domiciliaries of the state? Not applicable.
Do state’s exemptions have extraterritorial application?
Homestead: No. Haw. Rev. Stat. § 651-92(a)(1) applies to one parcel of real property “in the state of Hawaii.”
Personal property: Uncertain.
Wages: Haw. Rev. Stat. §§ 652-1(a), (b), 651-121, 653-3.
Has state opted out of federal bankruptcy exemptions? Yes. 735 Ill. Comp. Stat. § 5/12-1201.
Has state opted out of federal bankruptcy exemptions? Yes. Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 14, § 4426.
Is opt out limited to residents or domiciliaries of the state? Not specified. Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 14, § 4426: “[A] debtor may exempt from property of the debtor’s estate under [Title 11], only that property exempt under [11 U.S.C. § 522(b)(2)(A) and (B)].”
Do state’s exemptions have extraterritorial application?
Homestead: Uncertain.
Personal property: Uncertain.