14.5.4.10 Bank Setoff and Bank Fees
14.5.4.10 Bank Setoff and Bank Fees
The rule prohibits banks from debiting fees for processing the garnishment against the protected amount.540 In addition, the bank may collect such a fee only on the day the account is reviewed, so the bank cannot collect a fee at all if an account contains only the protected amount on that day.541 Except for these provisions, the rule is intentionally silent about bank setoff rights, including the key question of whether a bank can use setoff against exempt funds as a means of collecting a debt owed to the bank.542 However, the prohibition against banks taking fees from the protected amount supports the idea that banks do not have unfettered access to exempt amounts.543
State law may also restrict the fees that a depository institution can charge for a bank account attachment. For example, a New York law prohibits a banking institution from charging a fee if it is served with a garnishment notice but the debtor’s bank account is protected by law, or if it places a restraint on the account in violation of certain New York laws.544 Although federal rules preempt certain state laws that regulate non-interest charges and fees charged by national banks and federal savings associations,545 they leave state laws that pertain to the right to collect debts largely unaffected.546 As a result, courts may find that banks must abide by state limits on these fees. In any event, to the extent that state restrictions parallel the Treasury rule, there should be no preemption, because federal banking law preempts state laws only if they conflict with federal law.547
Limits on the banker’s right of setoff—and whether setoff can be used to reach exempt funds on deposit—are discussed briefly in § 14.3.3.4.2, supra, and in detail in NCLC’s Consumer Banking and Payments Law.548
Footnotes
-
540 31 C.F.R. § 212.6(h).
-
541 Id.
Garnishment fees may be deducted from funds on deposit, which are not included in the protected amounts. 76 Fed. Reg. 9939, 9947 (Feb. 23, 2011).
-
542 76 Fed. Reg. 9939, 9947 (Feb. 23, 2011). See Neal v. Pentagon Fed. Credit Union, 2018 WL 5786119, at *5 n.5 (D. Md. Nov. 5, 2018) (noting that 31 C.F.R. pt. 212 is inapplicable to bank setoff).
-
543 See National Consumer Law Center, Consumer Banking and Payments Law § 10.2 (6th ed. 2018), updated at www.nclc.org/library (legality of banks’ use of setoff against exempt funds).
-
544 N.Y. C.P.L.R. 5222(j) (McKinney).
-
545 12 C.F.R. §§ 7.4002 (fees charged by national banks), 7.4010 (applying same rules to federal savings associations).
-
546 12 C.F.R. § 7.4007(c)(4). See National Consumer Law Center, Mortgage Lending § 5.8.4.6 (3d ed. 2019), updated at www.nclc.org/library; National Consumer Law Center, Fair Debt Collection § 16.1.2 (9th ed. 2018), updated at www.nclc.org/library.
-
547 See National Consumer Law Center, Mortgage Lending § 5.8.4.6 (3d ed. 2019), updated at www.nclc.org/library.
-
548 National Consumer Law Center, Consumer Banking and Payments Law Ch. 10 (6th ed. 2018), updated at www.nclc.org/library.