13.3.9.2 FTC Prohibition of Waiver of Exemptions
13.3.9.2 FTC Prohibition of Waiver of Exemptions
The FTC’s Credit Practices Rule prohibits lenders and retail installment sellers from including waiver of exemption clauses in their consumer contracts.192 The rule prohibits a clause that “[c]onstitutes or contains an executory waiver or a limitation of exemption from attachment, execution, or other process on real or personal property held, owned by, or due to the consumer.” There is an exception that makes it clear that this provision does not prohibit security interests in exempt property, but the effect of this exception is limited by the separate prohibition in the Credit Practices Rule of most non-purchase money security interests in household goods.193
While there is no private cause of action for violation of an FTC Rule,194 inclusion of a clause that the FTC has declared unfair will be a violation of most states’ unfair and deceptive acts and practices (UDAP) statutes, as long as the creditor is covered by the statute.195 Such a clause is also unenforceable.196
West Virginia’s highest court found deceptive a contractual provision waiving the consumer’s rights to exempt certain property from seizure. The waiver was only “to the extent permitted by law,” and West Virginia prohibits such a waiver. The creditor argued that the contractual provision was not deceptive because the provision had no effect as it was not “permitted by law.” But the court found the provision misleading and likely to cause confusion or misunderstanding.197
Footnotes
-
192 16 C.F.R. § 444.2(a)(2), adopted by 49 Fed. Reg. 7740 (Mar. 1, 1984). See generally National Consumer Law Center, Federal Deception Law § 2.3.5 (3d ed. 2017), updated at www.nclc.org/library (detailed discussion of FTC’s rule and parallel guidances issued by banking agencies).
-
193 16 C.F.R. § 444.2(a)(4).
-
194 See National Consumer Law Center, Federal Deception Law § 2.2.4 (3d ed. 2017), updated at www.nclc.org/library.
-
195 See National Consumer Law Center, Federal Deception Law § 2.2.4.2 (3d ed. 2017), updated at www.nclc.org/library.
-
196 Free Bridge Auto Sales v. Fitzgerald, 48 Va. Cir. 1 (1999); F & S Fin. v. Jordan, 48 Va. Cir. 580 (1997).
-
197 Orlando v. Fin. One, 369 S.E.2d 882 (W. Va. 1988).