Filter Results CategoriesCart
Highlight Updates

11.5.3.11 Bail Bonds

In order to secure appearance at trial of a criminal defendant who has been granted pre-trial release, the court may require the payment of an amount of money as security (bail). Bail is generally, but not always, returned at the conclusion of trial, regardless of the outcome.323 If the defendant does not show up for trial, on the other hand, or violates the terms of pre-trial release, bail may be forfeited.

Given the often unaffordable nature of bail, an industry of private bondsmen has arisen over the last 100 years, offering what is essentially an exotic form of insurance. Bondsmen generally take up to 10% to 15% of the bail amount as an upfront fee for their services and require indemnification from the defendant or defendant’s guarantors in the event that the bond is forfeited. Bondsmen also frequently take security interests in the property of the defendant or the defendant’s guarantors.

The dischargeability of forfeited bail and bond debt in a chapter 7 bankruptcy is frequently litigated and has been accorded varying treatment across jurisdictions. Courts generally look to who owes the debt and to whom.324 Some courts conclude that a debt owed to a bail bondsman by a criminal defendant for forfeited bail is nondischargeable because section 523(a)(7) of the Bankruptcy Code contemplates such a “forfeiture,” and it is in the nature of a criminal penalty imposed for the failure to appear in court.325 Courts have found this to be the case even when the debtor is not the criminal defendant but rather the criminal defendant’s personal guarantor (usually a family member). While the debtors in such cases are not the defendants, and not subject to debt imposed as part of a criminal sentence, such debts have been nevertheless deemed to be in the nature of a “forfeiture,” and their nondischargeability is justified based on the same reluctance of the bankruptcy courts to interfere with administration of criminal justice proceedings.326

Most courts, however, have found a debt owed to a bail bondsman is either not in the nature of a “fine, penalty, or forfeiture” or it is not owed “to and for the benefit of a governmental unit” and is thus subject to discharge.327 To the extent that a bondsman’s fee is itself financed by the bondsman or a third party, a common practice in some jurisdictions, that debt may be dischargeable in a chapter 7 bankruptcy.

When a bondsmen regularly take security in collateral like homes and vehicles, even if the debt for the bondsman’s fee is discharged, a bondsman may still be able to foreclose on the security interest. Still, it may be possible to reduce or eliminate the bail bondsman’s lien in a chapter 13 case.328

Footnotes

  • 323 Some states also authorize the re-application of bail to outstanding criminal justice debt. Idaho Code Ann. § 19-2908; Obregon v. State, 703 N.E.2d 695, 696 (Ind. Ct. App. 1998); Maine Comm’n on Indigent Legal Servs., Guidelines for Determination of Financial Eligibility for Assigned Counsel and Reimbursement for Assigned Counsel Costs, ch. 401, § 2(1). But see State v. Zamarron, 806 N.W.2d 128 (Neb. Ct. App. 2011) (application of bond to court costs not allowed).

  • 324 Affordable Bail Bonds, Inc. v. Thompson (In re Thompson), 2007 WL 2738171 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. Sept. 12, 2007) (good discussion of three major configurations of parties in bail bond dischargeability). See also Virginia v. Collins (In re Collins), 173 F.3d 924 (4th Cir. 1999) (debt owed by bail bondsman to state arising from forfeited bail bonds held dischargeable).

  • 325 In re Gi Nam, 273 F.3d 281 (3d Cir. 2001); Virginia v. Collins (In re Collins), 173 F.3d 924, 932 n.4 (4th Cir. 1999).

  • 326 In re Gi Nam, 273 F.3d 281 (3d Cir. 2001); United States v. Zamora, 238 B.R. 842 (D. Ariz. 1999).

  • 327 In re Sandoval, 541 F.3d 997 (10th Cir. 2008); In re Hickman, 260 F.3d 400 (5th Cir. 2001); In re Sanchez, 365 B.R. 414 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2007); In re Lopes, 339 B.R. 82 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2006).

  • 328 See National Consumer Law Center, Consumer Bankruptcy Law and Practice § 11.6 (12th ed. 2020), updated at www.nclc.org/library (general discussion of dealing with claims of secured creditors).