11.5.3.7 Costs of Prosecution and Indigent Defense Fees
11.5.3.7 Costs of Prosecution and Indigent Defense Fees
“Costs of prosecution” is a loose term that can include many different amounts chargeable to a defendant, including but not limited to transcripts, depositions, and mileage for witnesses and prosecution staff. When included in the restitution order itself, courts have generally found the costs to be excepted from discharge,309 but when the fees are imposed outside of the restitution order, they are generally dischargeable.310
Few courts have directly dealt with indigent defense costs. Courts are split as to whether such costs are dischargeable.311 The decisions on both sides of the question are sparse on analysis.
The reasoning of the James v. Strange and Fuller v. Oregon cases312 suggests that it is a denial of equal protection to find nondischargeable an indigent debtor’s obligation to reimburse the state for court-appointed counsel, while making dischargeable unpaid attorney fees to debtors who can afford to hire a private attorney. The South Dakota Supreme Court, on equal protection grounds as set out in Strange, rejected a sentencing provision imposing probation revocation for attempting bankruptcy discharge of indigent defense fees.313
Footnotes
-
309 In re Thompson, 16 F.3d 576, 577–578 (4th Cir. 1994); In re Hollis, 810 F.2d 106 (6th Cir. 1987); In re Zarzynski, 771 F.2d 304 (7th Cir. 1985) (pre-Kelly case); In re Ryan, 389 B.R. 710 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2008); In re Garvin, 84 B.R. 824 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1988) (does not cite Kelly but, rather, prior convention).
-
310 United States v. Laws, 88 Fed. Appx. 448 (2d Cir. 2004) (cost of audit in embezzlement case not included in restitution order was dischargeable), vacated on other grounds, Radford v. United States, 543 U.S. 1106, 125 S. Ct. 1040, 160 L. Ed. 2d 1024 (2005).
-
311 Compare In re Emerson, 1991 WL 11731127 (Bankr. S.D. Iowa Apr. 5, 1991), with In re Polk, 2012 WL 8123378 (Bankr. E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2012), aff’d, 2014 WL 3940206 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2014).
-
312 See § 2.3, supra (full discussion of James and Fuller).
-
313 State v. Huth, 334 N.W.2d 485 (S.D. 1983) (pre-Kelly case).